Episode Description
You can walk into a custody evaluation with the truth on your side and still walk out with a result you never saw coming. That’s the reality that Reneé Rodriguez, founder of Best Foot Forward Consulting and creator of the Custody Blueprint™, helps her clients avoid. Drawing on her own experience going through a custody evaluation, as well as her years as a corporate strategist, Reneé explains why family courts default to equal parenting time and why breaking that default requires a specific kind of documentation, not just a compelling story.
In this podcast episode, Reneé walks us through what actually happens during a custody evaluation, from the first intake questionnaire all the way through interviews, psychological testing, and the home visits. She also shares why neutral language, careful documentation, and focusing on what you can prove can be far more powerful than trying to tell an evaluator everything your spouse has ever done.
What makes this conversation particularly compelling are the practical details Reneé shares about how to turn years of a relationship into a tight, structured narrative and how to understand what matters to an evaluator in your area.
This is the first of a two part series on custody evaluations. If you or someone you know is fighting for more custody or parenting time in their divorce, this two part podcast series should be at the top of your “must listen to” list.
(P.S. Don’t forget to subscribe so that you don’t miss part 2 of this important conversation.)
Show Notes
About Reneé
Reneé Rodriguez is the founder of Best Foot Forward Consulting and creator of The Custody Blueprint®. She has spent over a decade helping protective mothers challenge the family court system's default "50/50" custody shortcut by focusing on documented, undeniable facts rather than emotion. Her work sits at the intersection of strategy and advocacy, equipping mothers with the tools to build specific, evaluation-ready, and court-ready case files using her three-pillar methodology: Strategy, Mindset, and Evidence. By giving women the framework to present precise evidence, Reneé empowers them to navigate custody evaluations with confidence and ensure their child's real safety is prioritized.
Connect with Reneé
You can connect with Reneé on LinkedIn at Best Foot Forward Consulting and on Facebook at The Custody Blueprint. You can follow Reneé on YouTube at @TheCustodyBlueprint and on Instagram at thecustodyblueprint. To learn more about how to work with Reneé and get guidance on your custody situation, visit this personalized link here. You can also learn more about her 12-Week Custody Warriors Engagement program here or reach out directly at [email protected].
Key Takeaways From This Episode with Reneé
Do you like what you've heard?
Share the love so more people can benefit from this episode too!
Transcript
How to Avoid Making Mistakes in Your Custody Evaluation (Part 1)
SPEAKERS
Karen Covy, Reneé Rodriguez
TRANSCRIPT
[Episode Preview]
Reneé: An outcry basically means when you grab the ice cream out of the freezer, sit on the kitchen floor at three o'clock in the morning, and just cry as you finish the whole thing because you cannot believe that this is your life. Truth is—and sometimes I really have to push a client if they insist—I need to help you understand that the court does not care about you. There are a certain five questions that we know evaluators either have to ask or love to ask that always appear in their final reports.
Karen: And the biggest question that I end up usually spending weeks and weeks working with clients on is...
[Podcast Intro]
Karen: Hello, and welcome to Off the Fence, a podcast where we deconstruct difficult decision-making so we can discover what keeps us stuck, and more importantly, how we can get unstuck and start making even tough decisions with confidence. I'm your host, Karen Covy, a former divorce lawyer, mediator, and arbitrator turned coach, author, and entrepreneur. And now, without further ado, let's get on with the show.
Why 50-50 Isn’t Always Safety
Karen: With me today, I have the extreme pleasure of speaking with Reneé Rodriguez. Family courts default to 50-50 as if equal time is the same as equal safety. It isn't. And that default isn't a finding; it's a shortcut that lets custody evaluators avoid the harder work of assessing real risk.
Reneé Rodriguez has spent the last 10-plus years helping protective mothers challenge that shortcut, one documented, undeniable fact at a time.
As the founder of Best Foot Forward Consulting and the creator of The Custody Blueprint, she doesn't prepare clients to tell a more convincing story; she prepares them to build a record so specific and so well-organized that an evaluator can't recommend 50-50 without contradicting evidence that's already in the file.
Her work sits at the intersection of strategy and advocacy, naming the documented biases mothers face in custody evaluations and giving them the tools to meet the system on its own terms: evidence, not emotion; documentation, not narrative. Reneé, welcome to the show.
Reneé: Thank you so much, Karen. It's very nice to be here.
Karen: It is so exciting for me to have you here, because as we were chatting right before the show, it seems like I have a whole lot of clients who are dealing with custody issues and custody evaluations. As you and I both know, it is not what it seems to be at first blush. But before we dive into all things custody evaluations, I'm curious: how did you get started in this line of work? What's your story?
From Corporate Strategy To Custody Prep
Reneé: Well, it's a combination of two things. The simplest way to put it is that my clients' stories are my story.
When I first started in this, I was working in the corporate world, running strategy for nonprofit organizations and corporate strategy departments, feeling very on top of the world. Then things started going wrong with my co-parent, and I realized that something weird was happening. It took me about a year—which is actually quite quick compared to what many people go through—to realize that there were some very serious issues here.
When I ended up leaving and going through my custody case, this was a long time ago, Karen, so there wasn't all of this online awareness. The wonderful thing about the internet now is you can jump on TikTok to learn about narcissistic abuse, gaslighting, and coercive control psychological tactics. At that time, I only had Facebook, and I joined just to see if there was a group where I could find people going through the same thing.
I understood from the domestic violence hotline that I had suffered from domestic violence, but I didn't feel like I had quite found my people yet. Then somebody in one of the groups mentioned Tina Swithin, who started One Mom's Battle, calling her a wonderful divorce coach. At the time, I wondered, "What is a divorce coach?"
I ended up working with Tina largely because she was describing the exact kind of abuse I had gone through—the narcissism and cruelty behind closed doors from people who appear wonderful in public and sit at the top of their organization or political sphere.
As she was helping me figure things out, we reached a point where we were going to do a custody evaluation in my case. I asked her, "Tina, what do I do for this?" She said, "To be honest with you, this is not something I'm an expert in. I know two people who help prepare for this. Let me contact them." She got back to me to say that one could no longer take the trauma stories and had stopped doing the work, and the other was booked further out than I could wait.
Then she said, "Reneé, you're a strategist. You've been doing this forever. Put something together, and you and I will find our way." I did that, brought it back to her, and she said, "I've never seen anything like this. I've never seen anything lay out this type of abuse so clearly and compellingly. You should be a coach."
I said, "Slow your roll, Tina. I'm in the middle of a custody case and I have a great corporate job." But a year and a half later, I realized there was an opportunity to bring my strategy background into the family law space. It was hard to leave my corporate career, but I've never regretted it.
I built an A-to-Z process for custody battles, but my core passion—and the main focus of my company—is helping people navigate the custody evaluation.
Karen: So you helped yourself through your own custody evaluation, is what I'm hearing.
Reneé: Yeah.
Karen: I have to ask: how did it go?
Reneé: I have primary physical custody and final decision-making, and I have since the start. That's how the battle went. Obviously, we all still have to deal with co-parenting—that personality doesn't cure itself, unfortunately. But when you secure primary physical custody and final decision-making, it makes things so monumentally easier because there are far fewer fights, and there is far less damage to clean up regarding what your child experiences. There will still be cleanup because constitutional rights ensure the other parent receives parenting time, but it results in far less cleanup than there otherwise would be.
What A Custody Evaluation Includes
Karen: That's a great goal, and I think it's one that a lot of mothers share. The challenge is that the system currently defaults to 50-50 in most circumstances across most states. So let's back up a little bit and discuss what a custody evaluation is, what it can do, and what it can't do.
Reneé: It's an interesting thing that this is my passion, because it's not something I recommend people do lightly. It's quite expensive, and everything about family court is a gamble from the start, including the evaluation.
Looking at the technical aspects: how do you get to the point of having an evaluation, examination, or section 604.10 / 30-11 assessment? It usually originates from a court order. Parties can request it from the judge, or both sides can agree to submit to one.
Next, you need an evaluator. Most evaluators are mental health professionals (MHPs), but not always. We see retired judges and retired attorneys conducting them as well. Additionally, guardians ad litem often perform investigations following a similar logistical process.
Once the evaluator is set, the process begins with an intake form or questionnaire. I tell protective parents that this is the formal start of your evaluation—if you treat it like a routine intake form, you are off to a bad start. You want your answers to sound as neutral as possible. It may feel like your chance to list every problem, especially when the questionnaire prompts you to do so, but neutrality is essential.
For example, if you have a co-parent who gets blackout drunk and passes out in his vomit in front of the children, should you detail that exact scene on the initial questionnaire? No. You list "substance abuse" neutrally as a category of concern. This demonstrates that you aren't out to attack the other parent, but rather that you are focused on the child's well-being and identifying valid risk categories.
The next step involves interviews, which alternate between parents to prevent bias. Psychological testing usually occurs near the beginning or middle of the timeline. While evaluations used to take 3 to 6 months, they now frequently stretch to 5 to 12 months, which is agonizing for everyone involved, especially the children.
Interviews may consist of several one-hour or multi-hour sessions, along with potential joint sessions with your co-parent. There is usually a home visit to observe parent-child interactions, and evaluators may also interview the children privately in their office.
Neutral Language And Real Proof
Reneé: Then there is what I call the Body of Evidence (BOE). Just as I advise keeping questionnaires and interviews neutral and child-focused, you want to show how your child is thriving under your care. When asked about concerns regarding your co-parent, you must be truthful and authentic, but being truthful does not mean airing every minor complaint.
I ask clients: "Out of your mountain of grievances, what do you have concrete proof of?" Without proof, statements remain "he-said, she-said." When you back up every assertion with evidence, your credibility skyrockets.
Karen: Let me interrupt you right there and ask: what do you mean by proof? In the example you gave, where a spouse passes out drunk in his own vomit and the wife and child witness it, is their eyewitness account proof?
Reneé: Proof isn't found in narrative alone; proof in that context usually means photographs or video footage.
Karen: Okay.
Reneé: You have to be careful with video due to legal restrictions like reasonable expectations of privacy, but you want objective evidence confirming your statements.
However, you never want a photograph showing your children discovering their parent passed out, because that makes you look like a passive bystander allowing your child to be traumatized. Most parents capture those photos after the child runs to them in a panic, because a passed-out parent is terrifying to a young child.
Karen: Right. So if the child runs to you saying, "Mommy, Daddy is laying on the floor," you want a photo of the spouse in that state, but without the child in the frame.
Reneé: Exactly. You are documenting the reality of the situation. Clients often feel uncomfortable documenting these moments, but without objective evidence, it remains your word against theirs, and courts struggle to believe extreme allegations without documentation.
Karen: What happens if an incident occurred 6 months before the divorce was filed, and the parent didn't think to take a photo at the time?
Reneé: Most people do not gather evidence while still in the marriage unless they are actively planning an exit strategy. Consequently, the majority of evidence is gathered post-separation. When dealing with an abuser, post-separation abuse almost inevitably continues, providing ample opportunity to document ongoing behavior. It’s not about setting "gotcha" traps; it's about maintaining high standards of behavior yourself and letting their actions speak for themselves on paper.
Karen: So when you advise staying neutral during the initial evaluation, you mean avoiding past accusations unless they are backed by solid proof.
Reneé: As much as possible.
The Eight Minute Relationship Story
Reneé: There are about five specific core questions evaluators almost always ask and include in their final reports. The most critical question—which I spend weeks working on with clients—is telling the story of the relationship from the day they met to the day they separated.
Trauma stories are rarely linear. Clients often present initial drafts that are unstructured and filled with valid, disturbing grievances that the court ultimately won't prioritize. I help them refine the narrative: "The court does not care about what was done to you personally; the court cares about the children."
Framing everything around the children’s needs, stability, and development is key. It’s not about what he did to you; it's about what the children witnessed and experienced.
I structure this narrative into three parts, designed to be told in about 8 minutes (or scaled to 1 minute per year of the relationship):
- Who You Met: Describe what initially attracted you to your ex and the positive traits you saw. Focus on the specific charming traits that the evaluator is also likely to encounter when interviewing them.
- Behavioral Changes (Red Flags): Detail control, isolation, or silent treatments without using buzzwords like "narcissist," "gaslighting," or "red flags." If there was physical abuse, label it plainly as "violence" rather than softening it.
- Escalation to Cruelty or Violence: Detail the specific events that led to the breakup, focusing on explicit cruelty or danger toward the children.
This third section requires proof—such as time-stamped text messages, emails, voicemails, or outcry documentation (e.g., contemporaneous text messages sent to a trusted friend right after an event occurred). When arrogant abusers double down or admit to abusive behavior in text exchanges, that becomes your primary proof.
Karen: Is it acceptable in that third section to state directly, "And then he became cruel, and then he became violent"?
Reneé: Yes, absolutely. Use clear, authentic language that reflects your natural speaking voice rather than a rehearsed script.
When Kids Are Not Thriving
Karen: What if the children are not thriving? What if they are struggling significantly because of the ongoing situation?
Reneé: You frame it around what steps you take to help them regain stability and thrive. Children often return from an abusive parent's home severely dysregulated. Protective parents must demonstrate how they restore stability through consistent routines—such as regular extracurriculars or therapy.
If a child attends gymnastics every Wednesday, but the co-parent consistently misses taking them during their custodial Wednesdays, that failure directly impacts the viability of 50-50 schedules like week-on/week-off or 2-2-3 rotations. These details provide evaluators with practical evidence showing why certain custody schedules do not serve the child's best interest.
Evaluators are highly educated professionals who generally mean well, but trauma and litigation abuse leave parents in survival mode. If you cannot articulate your situation clearly in the format evaluators require for their legal reports, they cannot advocate for your position.
Tracking Evaluator Signals And Adjusting
Karen: How do you handle evaluators who default to 50-50 right out of the gate? Proving that something other than 50-50 is appropriate is a heavy bar to move.
Reneé: We work across the US and Canada, and default tendencies vary significantly by jurisdiction. If an evaluator strictly defaults to 50-50 regardless of evidence, paying $15,000 to $35,000 for an evaluation may be a waste of money compared to going straight to trial.
In strong 50-50 jurisdictions, we evaluate how rigorously the local courts enforce statutory custody factors. We establish clear categories of concern backed by solid evidence that align with those factors.
We also prepare clients meticulously for every interview session. Immediately after leaving an evaluation meeting, the client goes straight to their car, shuts the door, and dictates a detailed audio recording of everything remembered, including verbatim quotes. This allows us to spot red flags, analyze the evaluator's perspective, and course-correct before the next meeting.
[Part One Outro]
Karen: I hope you've enjoyed today's interview with Reneé Rodriguez. If you have, know that this is only part one of a two-part series. So if you don't want to miss next week's interview—where Reneé talks about bias in the system, guardians ad litem, and how you can navigate the court process in more detail—you're definitely going to want to hit the subscribe button right now. Whether you're on Apple, Spotify, or YouTube, hit that subscribe button so you get notified when part two of this series drops next week. I look forward to seeing you then!
